SINOSOLIO

HÓI HUMANAXES!

In the KUAKSOLIO, we already explain what are MU-, KUAK-, SI- and NO-preference. MU, NO, SI and KUAK are the basic concepts of any logical choice. MU and KUAK are hiddenly present in our logic, but not absent. On this section, we will explain how they connect with MU-, KUAK-, SI- and NO-situations.

Let me show you this with one example. Let me invite you in this example to a restaurant. Don't worry, I'll pay but also you don't get to eat. You are only in my brain and actually nobody is eating. In this restaurant, I need to get to order my meal, what ever you really really like we are going to have as the main meal for that is the reason I have come in to this restaurant. In this example, I'm having "schintzel".

Right, I really like schnitzel and I have been thinking about it for a few days. So I go in the restaurant and there seems to be an odd type of situation in which you must get a menu with 4 choices: Drink, Main course, dessert and coffee.

Drinks 🌊
Everyone is different, right? So I like schnitzel, I imagine you like other stuff. Drinks, in that I vary a lot: Sometimes I drink a beer, or a glass of water, or nothing, or wine, or whatever the other person is having... then for me drinks is a KUAK-sitaution. 🌊

Main course🌍
Then, it's the main. You know I want that schnitzel, but maybe in this example they don't have (don't worry, I'll my schnitzel sooner or later). But you may have to choose between different choices that aren't your favourite meal (SI-choice 🌍) but still this is the main mean, so you will chose something for sure. This is the SI-situation. 🌍

Dessert ☁️
They say that "everybody likes sweets" but I don't like sweets. I can eat them or not. I know I'm "weird", but for me, that's a MU-situation. I can them have or not, I'm entirely indifferent but you can offer me dessert and sometimes I say yes.

There are some desserts that I like more than others; others that I don't like at all; others which are also indifferent (MU-preference); others which I sometimes like but other times not, not a constant, that's a KUAK-preference.
So in my mid it goes like this:
MU-situation ☁️: Do you want dessert?
Me (in my mind) : I frankly don't care... everyone is having one so let me se what ice-cream they have:
Chocolate ice cream = SI-preference 🌍
Vanilla ice cream = MU-preference ☁️
Strawberry ice cream = NO-preference 🔥
Nothing = KUAK-preference 🌊

Coffee
I just don't drink coffee. I drink decaf, so let's not call that coffee. So for me, coffee is a no-situation (🔥), right? But even in a no-situation there may be choices... because you can choose not to have it or get that decaf or a tea.

So let's think know how this options look like in my head:

Drinks = KUAK-situation 🌊

Water/nothing = MU-preference ☁️ maybe
Wine = SI-preference 🌍 either
Juice = NO-preference 🔥 neither
Beer = KUAK-preference 🌊 but

"For drink, I could have maybe water... either wine... neither juice... but beer..."

Main course = yes-situation 🌍
Salad = MU-preference ☁️ and
Schnitzel =SI-preference 🌍 also (ever/all)
Soup = NO-preference 🔥 rarely (almost)
Pizza = KUAK-preference 🌊 often

"... then for main course, I could have often pizza and salad, also schnitzel, rarely soup..."

Dessert = MU-situation ☁️
Vanilla ice cream = MU-preference ☁️ any
Chocolate ice cream = IS-preference 🌍 rather
Strawberry ice cream = NO-preference 🔥 rather not
Nothing = KUAK-preference 🌊 or

"... for dessert, I could have rather chocolate ice cream, with any vanilla ice cream, rather not strawberry ice cream, or nothing..."

Coffee = no-situation 🔥
Nothing = MU-preference ☁️ also/too
Decaf/tea = SI-preference 🌍 some
Cappuccino = NO-preference 🔥 never
Espresso = KUAK-preference 🌊 a bit of (few)

"and for coffee, I could have some decaf, a bit of espresso, also nothing, never cappuccino after 11am".

Let's think about it in a table (situation top-right & preference left-below):

Therefore, we can see how all this logical concepts derive from understanding MU and its components ( NO, SI and KUAK). They are also the grammatical connectors in Babeliro, when pronounced in their word-form. I shall explain pronunciation on day 3:

• MUM = any

• RADER = rather

• INSTED = instead

• ODER = or

• I = and

• TUT = also

• LIR = almost/near

• MUx = much/often

• DEMAS = too/also

• SOM = some

• NOBOR = never

• POK = few

• LAR = maybe

• IDER = neither

• MAIY = but

Day 2: 16 logical connectors.

XÁO,
BIKTOR AURELIUS, LO BONIBOLIUSO STONOR DUS BABELAND
▷☐⎳⌋, ☽ ⎳, ☼ ⎄

⍉) Í DIKTÁ DOGOR LETISeRA LO TANTIMENTEME ENTUR AKUOS, LETI KUAKÁ ENKON AKUOS AKUFUS.
♁) Í MAKÁ DOGOR LO TANTIMENTATA I KUAKÁ AKUIRAFUS KÉ UNTERÁ TANTIMENTAFU I FROM AKUOS KÉ SOBERÁ LO TANTIMENTUFU, Í LIRO SERÁ KÉN.
♂) Í NOMÁ DOGOR LO TANTIMENTEME XELATA. Í SERÁ ANTALUNIOR I FUTLUNIOR SOLIOBA DOBLIUSO.
GENESIS ⌋; ⍉-♂
(BABELIRO v4.0)